ATUALIZAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA - JANEIRO 2016

Hepatite B

Predictors of hepatitis B e antigen-negative hepatitis in chronic hepatitis B virus-infected patients from childhood to adulthood

Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative hepatitis is a clinical indicator of poor outcome for chronic hepatitis B viral (HBV) infection. This long-term prospective cohort study aimed to elucidate the predictors of developing HBeAg-negative hepatitis in chronic HBV-infected subjects followed from childhood to adulthood. We followed 434 HBeAg-positive chronic HBV-infected patients from a median age of 7.22 years (interquartile range 4.31-10.21 years). Spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion occurred in 359 subjects at a median age of 13.93 years (interquartile range 8.76-20.59 years), and 75 subjects developed HBeAg seroconversion after antiviral therapy. These patients were followed for a median of 14.40 years (interquartile range 6.14-22.02 years) after HBeAg seroconversion. Clinical data were analyzed to delineate the predictors of developing HBeAg-negative hepatitis. The HBV basal core promoter and precore/core gene sequences were also evaluated in subjects with and without HBeAg-negative hepatitis. The overall annual incidence of HBeAg-negative hepatitis was 0.37% (95% confidence internal 0.35-0.39) in spontaneous HBeAg seroconverters. The overall annual incidence of HBeAg-negative hepatitis increased to 2.64% in lamivudine-treated subjects but did not increase in those treated with interferon-alpha (0.58%). Male gender (hazard ratio = 3.15), HBV genotype C (hazard ratio = 4.40), HBeAg seroconversion after 18 years of age (hazard ratio = 2.46), and lamivudine therapy prior to HBeAg seroconversion (hazard ratio = 1.42) were predictors of HBeAg-negative hepatitis in HBeAg seroconverters (P < 0.05). HBeAg-negative hepatitis subjects carried more A1762T/G1764A, C2063A, and A2131C HBV gene mutations than those without HBeAg-negative hepatitis. Conclusions: HBeAg seroconversion during childhood predicts a lower risk of HBeAg-negative hepatitis in later life. Interferon-alpha therapy may be an effective antiviral therapy beneficial in chronic HBV-infected children with severe inflammation that facilitates HBeAg seroconversion in earlier life. (Hepatology, 2016)

Hepatite C

Efficacy and safety of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/r and dasabuvir compared to IFN-containing regimens in genotype 1 HCV patients: The MALACHITE-I/II trials

Telaprevir plus pegylated interferon/ribavirin (TPV + PegIFN/RBV) remains a therapeutic option for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 1 infection in many regions. We conducted two open-label, phase IIIb trials comparing safety and efficacy of all-oral ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir ± ribavirin (OBV/PTV/r + DSV ± RBV) and TPV + PegIFN/RBV. Treatment-naïve (MALACHITE-I) or PegIFN/RBV-experienced (MALACHITE-II) non-cirrhotic, chronic HCV GT1-infected patients were randomized to OBV/PTV/r + DSV + weight-based RBV, OBV/PTV/r + DSV (treatment-naïve, GT1b-infected patients only), or 12 weeks of TPV + PegIFN + weight-based RBV and 12–36 additional weeks of PegIFN/RBV. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12). Patient-reported outcome questionnaires evaluated mental and physical health during the studies.

Three hundred eleven treatment-naïve and 148 treatment-experienced patients were randomized and dosed. Among treatment-naïve patients, SVR12 rates were 97% (67/69) and 82% (28/34), respectively, in OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV and TPV + PegIFN/RBV-treated GT1a-infected patients; SVR12 rates were 99% (83/84), 98% (81/83), and 78% (32/41) in OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV, OBV/PTV/r + DSV, and TPV + PegIFN/RBV-treated GT1b-infected patients. Among treatment-experienced patients, SVR12 rates were 99% (100/101) and 66% (31/47) with OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV and TPV + PegIFN/RBV. Mental and physical health were generally better with OBV/PTV/r + DSV ± RBV than TPV + PegIFN/RBV. Rates of discontinuation due to adverse events (0–1% and 8–11%, respectively, p <0.05) and rates of hemoglobin decline to <10 g/dl (0–4% and 34–47%, respectively, p <0.05) were lower for OBV/PTV/r + DSV ± RBV than TPV + PegIFN/RBV. Among non-cirrhotic, HCV GT1-infected patients, SVR12 rates were 97–99% with 12 week, multi-targeted OBV/PTV/r + DSV ± RBV regimens and 66–82% with 24–48 total weeks of TPV + PegIFN/RBV. OBV/PTV/r + DSV ± RBV was associated with a generally better mental and physical health, more favorable tolerability, and lower rates of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events. (Journal of Hepatology, 2016).

Ideal oral combinations to eradicate HCV: The role of ribavirin

Current all-oral interferon-free regimens offer sustained virological response (SVR) rates above 90% as well as 12-week treatment durations for the majority of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV), including treatment-naïve and -experienced patients with or without cirrhosis. There are multiple direct-acting antiviral (DAA) combinations that can be selected to optimize efficacy and safety outcomes. Each of them can be tailored according to different parameters including the use of ribarivin (RBV). For sofosbuvir (SOF)-based combinations, RBV is useful in the following situations: HCV genotype 1, treatment-experienced, cirrhotic patients, or patients with decompensated cirrhosis, and HCV genotype 3, cirrhotic patients. In these situations the addition of RBV allows to shorten the treatment to 12 weeks in the majority of cases and therefore decreases the cost of the treatment. The need of RBV remains to be determined in cirrhotic patients with a SOF plus simeprevir regimen. RBV-containing regimens are recommended in all HCV genotype 1a patients who receive the 3-DAA combination: paritaprevir/r, ombitasvir, dasabuvir. Globally, the addition of RBV to the different combinations of DAA increases slightly the risk of anaemia. However severe anaemia was rare and easily manageable with RBV dose reduction without any impact on SVR. (Journal of Hepatology, 2016).

Esteatose hepática

Presence of diabetes mellitus and steatosis is associated with liver stiffness in a general population: The Rotterdam study

Given that little is known about the prevalence of, and factors associated with, liver fibrosis in the general population, we aimed to investigate this in a large, well-characterized cohort by means of transient elastography (TE). This study was part of the Rotterdam Study, a population-based study among individuals ≥45 years. All participants underwent abdominal ultrasound and TE. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) ≥8.0 kilopascals (kPa) was used as a cutoff suggesting clinically relevant fibrosis. Of 3,041 participants (age, 66.0 ± 7.6 years) with reliable LSM, 169 (5.6%) participants had LSM ≥8.0 kPa. Age (odds ratio [OR]: 2.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.72-3.36; P < 0.001), alanine aminotransferase (ALT; OR, 1.24; 95% CI: 1.12-1.38; P < 0.001), smoking (OR, 1.77; 95% CI: 1.16-2.70; P = 0.008), spleen size (OR, 1.23; 95% CI: 1.09-1.40; P = 0.001), hepatitis B surface antigen, or anti–hepatitis C virus positivity (OR, 5.38; 95% CI: 1.60-18.0; P = 0.006), and combined presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and steatosis (OR, 5.20; 95% CI: 3.01-8.98; P < 0.001 for combined presence) were associated with LSM ≥8.0 kPa in multivariable analyses. The adjusted predicted probability of LSM ≥8.0 kPa increased per age decade, with probabilities ranging from 1.4% (0.9-3.6) in participants ages 50-60 years to 9.9% (6.8-14.5) in participants >80 years. Participants with both DM and steatosis had the highest probabilities of LSM ≥8.0 kPa (overall probability: 17.2% [12.5-23.4]; this probability did not increase with age [P = 0.8]). Conclusion: In this large population-based study of older adults, LSM ≥8.0 kPa, suggestive of clinically relevant fibrosis, was present in 5.6% and was strongly associated with steatosis and DM. In the context of an aging population and an increased prevalence of DM and obesity, this study illustrates that liver fibrosis may become a more prominent public health issue in the near future. (Hepatology 2016)

Cirrose hepática

Development of hyperdynamic circulation and response to β-blockers in compensated cirrhosis with portal hypertension

Nonselective β-blockers are useful to prevent bleeding in patients with cirrhosis and large varices but not to prevent the development of varices in those with compensated cirrhosis and portal hypertension (PHT). This suggests that the evolutionary stage of PHT may influence the response to β-blockers. To characterize the hemodynamic profile of each stage of PHT in compensated cirrhosis and the response to β-blockers according to stage, we performed a prospective, multicenter (tertiary care setting), cross-sectional study. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and systemic hemodynamic were measured in 273 patients with compensated cirrhosis before and after intravenous propranolol (0.15 mg/kg): 194 patients had an HVPG ≥10 mm Hg (clinically significant PHT [CSPH]), with either no varices (n = 80) or small varices (n = 114), and 79 had an HVPG >5 and <10 mm Hg (subclinical PHT). Patients with CSPH had higher liver stiffness (P < 0.001), worse Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (P < 0.001), more portosystemic collaterals (P = 0.01) and splenomegaly (P = 0.01) on ultrasound, and lower platelet count (P < 0.001) than those with subclinical PHT. Patients with CSPH had lower systemic vascular resistance (1336 ± 423 versus 1469 ± 335 dyne · s · cm-5, P < 0.05) and higher cardiac index (3.3 ± 0.9 versus 2.8 ± 0.4 L/min/m2, P < 0.01). After propranolol, the HVPG decreased significantly in both groups, although the reduction was greater in those with CSPH (-16 ± 12% versus -8 ± 9%, P < 0.01). The HVPG decreased ≥10% from baseline in 69% of patients with CSPH versus 35% with subclinical PHT (P < 0.001) and decreased ≥20% in 40% versus 13%, respectively (P = 0.001). Conclusion: Patients with subclinical PHT have less hyperdynamic circulation and significantly lower portal pressure reduction after acute β-blockade than those with CSPH, suggesting that β-blockers are more suitable to prevent decompensation of cirrhosis in patients with CSPH than in earlier stages. (Hepatology 2016)

Carcinoma Hepatocelular

Hepatocellular carcinoma and lifestyles

The majority of hepatocellular carcinoma occurs over pre-existing chronic liver diseases that share cirrhosis as an endpoint. In the last decade, a strong association between lifestyle and hepatocellular carcinoma has become evident. Abundance of energy-rich food and sedentary lifestyles have caused metabolic conditions such as obesity and diabetes mellitus to become global epidemics. Obesity and diabetes mellitus are both tightly linked to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and also increase hepatocellular carcinoma risk independent of cirrhosis. Emerging data suggest that physical activity not only counteracts obesity, diabetes mellitus and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, but also reduces cancer risk. Physical activity exerts significant anticancer effects in the absence of metabolic disorders. Here, we present a systematic review on lifestyles and hepatocellular carcinoma. (Journal of Hepatology, 2016)



 
     
  HOME | A CASA DA HEPATITE | HEPATITE | NOTÍCIAS | CONTATO
Casa da Hepatite - Universidade Metropolitana de Santos
Developed by GDM - Unimes Virtual